Galeria Foto Apasa aici pentru inregistrare  

Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

  Home · Search · Register  

Home » Expo » Portret « Previous image · Slide Show · Next image »

o_004
Tot inainte!

Photo Details
freestate


Senior member
users gallery
canon EOS 500, ilford PAN 400, filtru UV, scanner HP 1510

workshop brasov/rasnov 21-22.10.2006
· Date: 7, November, 2006 · Views: 2002 ·
Additional Info
Keywords: Tot inainte!
Print View


Author
Thread   Post A Reply  
horhhe
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit horhhe's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
+++
atmosfera, claritate, calitate
  Report Post
lens
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit lens's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Ce spune HORHHE e sfant ! +++
  Report Post
snowfox
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit snowfox's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Imi place! +++
  Report Post
piticu
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit piticu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
am o singura nelamurire: de ce ai folosit filtru uv?
  Report Post
freestate
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit freestate's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Multumesc horhhe, lens, snowfox, piticu

piticu, filtrul UV eu nu il dau jos aproape niciodata de pe nici un obiectiv (am pe toate cate unul). In primul rand protejeaza lentila (de praf, zgarieturi etc). Alte calitati: face imaginea mai clara, da un contrast mai mare si sa nu uitam de penetrarea paclei (radiatiile ultra-violete si alte porcarii din atmosfera)

p.s. eu folosesc doar aparate analogice. Pe film sa sti ca altfel sta treaba si de aici toate filtrele. Sper ca am raspuns la ce ai vrut sa sti. cele bune
  Report Post
piticu
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit piticu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
filtru uv da un contrast mai mare si face imaginea mai clara? eu stiam ca orce sticla pusa pe linga aia din fabrica, a lentilei, face poza mai proasta. haleste lumina, baga reflexii etc etc

picla o penetrezi mult mai bine cu un filtru ir, sau, in caz ca nai film ir, cun portocaliu sau rosu.
  Report Post
freestate
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit freestate's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
am rosu, filtrul rosu totusi nu se folosete la portrete - necesta timp lung de expunere si face contrastul prea puternic - este bun la peisaje

si da uv-ul asta face - uita-te pe la hoya si cokin

a, si filtrele nu sunt chiar "orice sticla" - ele sunt facute cu scopul de aimbunatatii imaginea
  Report Post
piticu
7, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit piticu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
parerea mea despre utilitatea filtrelor uv este ca nu sint decit o gaselnitza a alora de la hoya, b+w sau mai stiu eu cine le face. hai sa vedem ce zicea domnu adams, pe care il admiri asa mult:

"Extreme violet radiation invisible to the eye can affect photographic emulsions, frequently contributing to haze in distant landscape. [...] The uv filters are effective below about 400nm, roughly the limit of visible radiation. Some photographers keep one of these filters on their lenses at all times, both for their uv absorption and to protect the lens. Since filters may cause serious loss of optical image quality, i suggest limiting this use to adverse conditions such as blowing sand or salt spray from the ocean."
AA, The Negative, p112

deci. cum subiectul pozei nu este 'distant landscape' nu avea nici un rost sa ti uv pe sticla. parerea mea.
  Report Post
freestate
8, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit freestate's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
ok fie ca tine. nu am chef sa continui discutia, s-a ajuns intr-un punct unde urmeaza sa spunem care e mai bun: tu sau eu. si nu despre asta e vorba aici

p.s. de unde ai scos faza ca il admir foarte mult pe AA? in fotografie imi plac multi si atat, nu am (poate inca) un preferat.

si app.. asta zicea el acum cati ani? tehnologia am impresia ca a mai evoluat de atunci. dar fie cum zici tu... arunc toate UV-urile..
  Report Post
stefan_foto
8, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
omul cu lemnele...f faina... bine prins...poate ca mergea mai bine aparatul ceva mai jos..in rest f expresiva...bravo's.
  Report Post
freestate
8, November, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit freestate's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
probabil mergea. dar dupa cum vezi este un gard acolo..
  Report Post

Powered by: PhotoPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.