Galeria Foto Apasa aici pentru inregistrare  

Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

  Home · Search · Register  

Home » Expo » Arhitectura « Previous image · Slide Show · Next image »

459post-47-1082101354
Camera de Comert (1)

Photo Details
zzz


Senior member
users gallery
· Date: 11, May, 2004 · Views: 2633 ·
Additional Info
Keywords: Camera de Comert (1)
Print View


Author
Thread   Post A Reply  
marianio
11, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit marianio's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Interesant de aflat si datele tehnice.
  Report Post
nexusiulis
12, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit nexusiulis's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
"datele tehnice" se gasesc probabil in Corel photopaint sau photoshop.
  Report Post
DjVu
12, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit DjVu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Si care-i problema nexusiulis?
  Report Post
zzz
12, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit zzz's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
datele din Exif:

Make - EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Model - KODAK DX6490 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERA
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 230
YResolution - 230
ResolutionUnit - Inch
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
ExifOffset - 506
ExposureTime - 8/1 seconds
FNumber - 6.30
ExposureProgram - Manual control
ExifVersion - 220
DateTimeOriginal - 2004:04:14 20:34:53
DateTimeDigitized - 2004:04:14 20:34:53
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/0 seconds
ApertureValue - F 6.28
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.83
MeteringMode - Multi-segment
LightSource - Auto
Flash - Not fired, compulsory flash mode
FocalLength - 6.30 mm
FlashPixVersion - 010
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 624
ExifImageHeight - 468
InteroperabilityOffset - 2404
ExposureIndex - 80
SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
FileSource - Other
SceneType - Other
CustomRendered - Normal process
ExposureMode - Manual
WhiteBalance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 0.00 x
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 38 mm
SceneCaptureType - Standard
GainControl - None
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
SubjectDistanceRange - Unknown
  Report Post
zzz
12, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit zzz's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Pentru nexusiulis:

Am pus si imaginea originala, pentru comparatie aici:
http://www.galeriafoto.com/photos/sh...php?photo=3610

In PS s-a corectat perspectiva si s-a scos un bloc in stanga.

Nu vad de ce ti-ai permis sa dai nota 3.
Ar trebui sa te abtii atunci cand tu nu poti sau nu stii sa faci fotografii ca aceasta. Sau, daca stii, dovedeste-o!
  Report Post
duke
12, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
sa corectam un pic media, ca e o poza foarte buna
  Report Post
tano
18, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit tano's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
singura modificare pe care eu as fi facut-o ar fi fost un background in gradient cu doua noante de albastru ( mai deschis in partea superioara )
  Report Post
florin_constantinescu
22, May, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit florin_constantinescu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Si mie mi se pare aiurea!!! Da-o naibii de treaba. Cred ca notarea a fost la mishto, sau i-a scapat mouse-ul pe submit!
Chiar daca era modificata soft, care era dom'le problema? Ce expunem si analizam aici pe galerie? Un rezultat al muncii de fotograf sau cum am ajuns la acel rezultat? Dau si eu un 10 ca sa corectam media (desi as fi dat un 8).
zzz parerea mea este ca originalul este deasupra cu mult. Ii dau un 10 din suflet. La prelucrare ma deranjeaza contrastul excesiv...Se pierde din poezia fotografiei, din superflu si parca nu are viata. La original, liniile sunt blande si cladirea are suflet...nu stiu daca ma intelegi...
  Report Post
bogdiN
21, July, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit bogdiN's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
mi se pare fantastica, cu o singura specificatie, si anume, in general predomina sharpen, iar partile negre sunt unsharp, si asta o face sa arate "prelucrata"
  Report Post
AlinaM
18, September, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Ma simt ca o furnica acum ca vad ditamai minunatia de cladire. Imi place... nu ma deranjaza asa mult prelucrarea.
  Report Post
LordGhost
21, October, 2004
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit LordGhost's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
super poza..cat ai lucrat frate la ea, ca mi se pare ca ai modificat destul in ea
  Report Post

Powered by: PhotoPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.