|
Author
|
|
Thread
|
|
|
marianio
Junior member
Registered: January 2004
Location: Bucuresti - Romania
Posts: 122
|
|
|
Interesant de aflat si datele tehnice.
|
|
|
|
nexusiulis
Junior member
Registered: May 2004
|
|
|
"datele tehnice" se gasesc probabil in Corel photopaint sau photoshop.
|
|
|
|
|
DjVu
Junior member
Registered: July 2003
Posts: 57
|
|
|
Si care-i problema nexusiulis?
|
|
|
|
|
zzz
Senior member
Registered: April 2004
Location: Bucuresti
|
|
|
datele din Exif:
Make - EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Model - KODAK DX6490 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERA
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 230
YResolution - 230
ResolutionUnit - Inch
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
ExifOffset - 506
ExposureTime - 8/1 seconds
FNumber - 6.30
ExposureProgram - Manual control
ExifVersion - 220
DateTimeOriginal - 2004:04:14 20:34:53
DateTimeDigitized - 2004:04:14 20:34:53
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/0 seconds
ApertureValue - F 6.28
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.83
MeteringMode - Multi-segment
LightSource - Auto
Flash - Not fired, compulsory flash mode
FocalLength - 6.30 mm
FlashPixVersion - 010
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 624
ExifImageHeight - 468
InteroperabilityOffset - 2404
ExposureIndex - 80
SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
FileSource - Other
SceneType - Other
CustomRendered - Normal process
ExposureMode - Manual
WhiteBalance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 0.00 x
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 38 mm
SceneCaptureType - Standard
GainControl - None
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
SubjectDistanceRange - Unknown
|
|
|
|
|
zzz
Senior member
Registered: April 2004
Location: Bucuresti
|
|
|
Pentru nexusiulis:
Am pus si imaginea originala, pentru comparatie aici:
http://www.galeriafoto.com/photos/sh...php?photo=3610
In PS s-a corectat perspectiva si s-a scos un bloc in stanga.
Nu vad de ce ti-ai permis sa dai nota 3.
Ar trebui sa te abtii atunci cand tu nu poti sau nu stii sa faci fotografii ca aceasta. Sau, daca stii, dovedeste-o!
|
|
|
|
|
duke
Senior member
Registered: January 2004
Location: Tg Mures
Posts: 322
|
|
|
sa corectam un pic media, ca e o poza foarte buna
|
|
|
|
|
tano
Junior member
Registered: December 2003
Location: focsani / vrancea
Posts: 176
|
|
|
singura modificare pe care eu as fi facut-o ar fi fost un background in gradient cu doua noante de albastru ( mai deschis in partea superioara )
|
|
|
|
|
florin_constantinescu
Senior member
Registered: September 2003
Location: www.crosslight.ro
Posts: 461
|
|
|
Si mie mi se pare aiurea!!! Da-o naibii de treaba. Cred ca notarea a fost la mishto, sau i-a scapat mouse-ul pe submit!
Chiar daca era modificata soft, care era dom'le problema? Ce expunem si analizam aici pe galerie? Un rezultat al muncii de fotograf sau cum am ajuns la acel rezultat? Dau si eu un 10 ca sa corectam media (desi as fi dat un 8).
zzz parerea mea este ca originalul este deasupra cu mult. Ii dau un 10 din suflet. La prelucrare ma deranjeaza contrastul excesiv...Se pierde din poezia fotografiei, din superflu si parca nu are viata. La original, liniile sunt blande si cladirea are suflet...nu stiu daca ma intelegi...
|
|
|
|
|
bogdiN
Junior member
Registered: September 2003
Location: Cluj-Napoca
Posts: 26
|
|
|
mi se pare fantastica, cu o singura specificatie, si anume, in general predomina sharpen, iar partile negre sunt unsharp, si asta o face sa arate "prelucrata"
|
|
|
|
|
AlinaM
Junior member
Registered: September 2004
Location: Bucursti
Posts: 29
|
|
Sat September 18, 2004 2:31pm
|
|
|
Ma simt ca o furnica acum ca vad ditamai minunatia de cladire. Imi place... nu ma deranjaza asa mult prelucrarea.
|
|
|
|
|
LordGhost
Junior member
Registered: October 2004
Location: Pe aci..pe undeva
Posts: 40
|
|
Wed October 20, 2004 11:17pm
|
|
|
super poza..cat ai lucrat frate la ea, ca mi se pare ca ai modificat destul in ea 
|
|
|
|
|
Galeria Foto
