Galeria Foto Apasa aici pentru inregistrare  

Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

  Home · Search · Register  

Home » Gallery » Fauna « Previous image · Slide Show · Next image »

596IMG_4157_1m1
cirip

Photo Details
rosana


Senior member
users gallery
iso400, f5.6, 1/500s si dati un click, ca e mai mare
· Date: 20, February, 2006 · Views: 3003 ·
Additional Info
Keywords: cirip
Print View


Author
Thread   Post A Reply  
rosana
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit rosana's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Eu si amicul meu Mihai ne ciondanim de azi dimineata : "ba culorile mele sunt mai bune"
http://www.galeriafoto.com/photos/sh...hp?photo=24039
http://www.galeriafoto.com/photos/sh...hp?photo=24040
Voi ce ziceti?

  Report Post
Mihai.M
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit Mihai.M's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Deci cum sa ma exprim... culorile mele sint mai bune!
  Report Post
rosana
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit rosana's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Poate ai un obiectiv mai bun, culori in nici un caz.
  Report Post
Mihai.M
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit Mihai.M's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Data viitoare ti-l dau sa fotografiezi tu cu el, sa il cari agatzat de camera citeva ore, mai vorbim dupa aia :P
  Report Post
rosana
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit rosana's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Nu, nu...ca aluia cred ca ii e greata, d-aia vede totul in verde. Am sa caut de imprumut unul de 400, sau mai bine de 600mm. Cu ala precis va iesi totul roz.
  Report Post
Mihai.M
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit Mihai.M's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Pai da, - o sa mi-l dai mie sa ma handralesc cu el, las' ca stiu eu Nu roz, ci rosu in fatza ochilor o sa vad!
  Report Post
bogdix
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit bogdix's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
ce amuzant e tot dialogul asta al vostru e clar ca pozele lui MihaiM sunt in tenta verde. dar si poza rosanei e putzin pala... poate fi si de la lumina...
  Report Post
the rookie
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit the rookie's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Pot sa spun si eu ceva?

Nu inteleg unde este controversa... este clar ca lumina zilei ca rosana a reusit o cromatica mult mai aproape de realitate (daca va uitati numai la histograme si apare evident). Mihai.M are mai mult galben si apoi cyan, asta ca sa nu zic verde, ca nu-i tot aia.

Si apoi ce nu inteleg este de ce va tot certati pe fringe-ul teleobiectivelor... este stiut ca cu cit distanta focala creste (si formatul ramine acelasi), cu atit fringe-ul apare mai accentuat... ca regula generala si foarte aproximativa, catre magenta (purple) pentru teleobiectivele cu reflexie (mici si grase, cu oglinda) si catre portocaliu (orange) pentru cele cu refractie (lungi si subtiri, cu doua trenuri optice). Fringe se manifesta pe la contururi, de obicei "intr-o parte", iar incercarea de a-l corecta in JPEG-uri din "color balance" aduce intotdeauna o dominanta de "verde" serioasa. Daca insa folositi formatul RAW, CS are in convertorul sau RAW posibilitati mai elegante de corectie "lens fringe", iar convertoarele originale ale camerelor (NEF, CRW, etc.) sint mult mai bune, in variantele complete. Totusi apare o dominanta in orice caz, de aceea corectiile se fac pe o cale ceva mai laborioasa pentru "nature photography"... Pentru curiozitate, va recomand tuturor incepatorilor in PS un site excelent, la obiect si fara multa polologhie:
http://epaperpress.com/psphoto/index.html
  Report Post
rosana
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit rosana's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Pai nici vorba de fringe in cazul de fatza, ca m-am uitat cu atentie. Daca ar fi fost se putea corecta in PS CS fara prea mari probleme.
Amandoi am lucrat pe raw si e vorba de temperatura de culoare aleasa de fiecare, tint si balansarea culorilor in general. Pur si simplu fiecare a avut o alta viziune. Si ne ciondanim amical in continuare.

Pentru cine vrea si poze despre cum e cu fringe-ul , iaca aici: http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glos...rration_01.htm
  Report Post
Claudiu
20, February, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit Claudiu's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
Felicitari rosana.Superba
  Report Post
mad_grll
20, March, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Visit mad_grll's homepage! Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
ete' pasaroiu...vrea sa se transforme intr-un buchet de flori... intr'adevar culorile lasa de dorit.
  Report Post

11, June, 2006
Click here to see this users profile Click here to Send this user a Private Message Find more posts by this user Visit this user's gallery
ba a rosanei sunt mai bune!
  Report Post

Powered by: PhotoPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.